<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 534 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee. The Tribunal reduced various disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, considering the genuineness of expenses, lack of adverse material, and procedural lapses in the assessment process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence and procedural adherence in disallowing expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 534 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee. The Tribunal reduced various disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, considering the genuineness of expenses, lack of adverse material, and procedural lapses in the assessment process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence and procedural adherence in disallowing expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>