https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214219 The appeal filed by the appellant before the AAIFR against an order passed by BIFR was initially dismissed as time-barred due to not being filed within the prescribed period. However, upon further investigation, it was revealed that the BIFR order was never received by the appellant, leading to the appeal being filed within the appropriate timeframe. The High Court set aside the AAIFR's decision, criticizing their error in passing orders without verifying the delivery status of the order. The Court emphasized the incidental powers of authorities to rectify mistakes and ensure the proper exercise of statutory powers. Ultimately, the writ petition was allowed, with each party responsible for their own costs. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214219 The appeal filed by the appellant before the AAIFR against an order passed by BIFR was initially dismissed as time-barred due to not being filed within the prescribed period. However, upon further investigation, it was revealed that the BIFR order was never received by the appellant, leading to the appeal being filed within the appropriate timeframe. The High Court set aside the AAIFR's decision, criticizing their error in passing orders without verifying the delivery status of the order. The Court emphasized the incidental powers of authorities to rectify mistakes and ensure the proper exercise of statutory powers. Ultimately, the writ petition was allowed, with each party responsible for their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214219