<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214192</link>
    <description>In an appeal against a block assessment, the legality and validity of the underlying search can be examined as a jurisdictional issue because the search forms the foundation of the assessment. The Tribunal is required to test that jurisdictional basis before going into the merits of the assessment, and the assessee is not barred from raising the objection in appeal merely because no separate writ petition was filed against the search action. The text states that this approach is necessary to determine whether the assessment order can legally stand and that the contrary view on the Tribunal&#039;s power was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214192</link>
      <description>In an appeal against a block assessment, the legality and validity of the underlying search can be examined as a jurisdictional issue because the search forms the foundation of the assessment. The Tribunal is required to test that jurisdictional basis before going into the merits of the assessment, and the assessee is not barred from raising the objection in appeal merely because no separate writ petition was filed against the search action. The text states that this approach is necessary to determine whether the assessment order can legally stand and that the contrary view on the Tribunal&#039;s power was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>