<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 499 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214187</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the income from the kalyana mandapam is property income and not business income. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, consistent with previous decisions and the consistent treatment of the income in past assessments. The court found no grounds to refer the matter to a Full Bench or to remand it back to the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 499 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214187</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the income from the kalyana mandapam is property income and not business income. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, consistent with previous decisions and the consistent treatment of the income in past assessments. The court found no grounds to refer the matter to a Full Bench or to remand it back to the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>