<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 497 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214185</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenging the dismissal of the winding-up petition against the respondent company for a debt of Rs. 17,26,952/- owed for fabric supplied. The court found the respondent company&#039;s defense bona fide, emphasizing the need for evidence adjudication. The court upheld the application of Order 12 Rule 6 of the CPC for admissions in winding-up petitions and affirmed the doctrine of single economic entity in transactions between sister concerns. The judgment clarified that its findings would not affect pending Suits related to the dispute, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 497 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214185</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenging the dismissal of the winding-up petition against the respondent company for a debt of Rs. 17,26,952/- owed for fabric supplied. The court found the respondent company&#039;s defense bona fide, emphasizing the need for evidence adjudication. The court upheld the application of Order 12 Rule 6 of the CPC for admissions in winding-up petitions and affirmed the doctrine of single economic entity in transactions between sister concerns. The judgment clarified that its findings would not affect pending Suits related to the dispute, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>