<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 480 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the disclosed income in the return filed under section 153A was accepted, indicating no concealment of income. Consequently, the assessing officer was instructed to remove the penalty, and the appeal by the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 480 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the disclosed income in the return filed under section 153A was accepted, indicating no concealment of income. Consequently, the assessing officer was instructed to remove the penalty, and the appeal by the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>