<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214164</link>
    <description>Under the India-UK treaty, marketing and management service receipts were not fees for technical services unless the services made technical knowledge, skill, experience or processes available so the recipient could perform them independently; only the India-linked services were attributable to the service permanent establishment as business profits. Reimbursement of lease line charges was not royalty because no equipment was placed at the payer&#039;s disposal and no technical information was imparted. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was not chargeable where tax was deductible at source on the non-resident&#039;s income. Reimbursement for employees&#039; foreign visits required factual verification. Consideration for assignment of customer contracts executed outside India was not taxable in India or attributable to the permanent establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214164</link>
      <description>Under the India-UK treaty, marketing and management service receipts were not fees for technical services unless the services made technical knowledge, skill, experience or processes available so the recipient could perform them independently; only the India-linked services were attributable to the service permanent establishment as business profits. Reimbursement of lease line charges was not royalty because no equipment was placed at the payer&#039;s disposal and no technical information was imparted. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was not chargeable where tax was deductible at source on the non-resident&#039;s income. Reimbursement for employees&#039; foreign visits required factual verification. Consideration for assignment of customer contracts executed outside India was not taxable in India or attributable to the permanent establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>