<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214162</link>
    <description>The ITAT&#039;s judgment focused on condoning the delay in filing the appeal, justifying the delay by the assessee, affirming the maintainability of the appeal despite the absence of assessment, and ensuring the admissibility of the appeal against the order for charging interest. The decision aimed to provide a fair and consistent approach to similar cases with varying assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214162</link>
      <description>The ITAT&#039;s judgment focused on condoning the delay in filing the appeal, justifying the delay by the assessee, affirming the maintainability of the appeal despite the absence of assessment, and ensuring the admissibility of the appeal against the order for charging interest. The decision aimed to provide a fair and consistent approach to similar cases with varying assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>