<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214153</link>
    <description>A dishonoured cheque carries a statutory presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and a bare denial unsupported by written agreement, contemporaneous protest, or reply to notice does not ordinarily rebut that presumption or create a bona fide triable defence in a summary suit. The commentary also notes that where a company is effectively controlled as a family vehicle and the corporate form is used to defeat legitimate claims, the court may lift the corporate veil and fasten joint and several liability on the controllers. Section 70 of the Contract Act is referenced as reinforcing repayment where benefits are received without a valid contractual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214153</link>
      <description>A dishonoured cheque carries a statutory presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and a bare denial unsupported by written agreement, contemporaneous protest, or reply to notice does not ordinarily rebut that presumption or create a bona fide triable defence in a summary suit. The commentary also notes that where a company is effectively controlled as a family vehicle and the corporate form is used to defeat legitimate claims, the court may lift the corporate veil and fasten joint and several liability on the controllers. Section 70 of the Contract Act is referenced as reinforcing repayment where benefits are received without a valid contractual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>