https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214151 Duty demand linked to destruction of goods by fire was treated as premature where the remission application remained undecided. The tribunal noted that the liability to demand duty, and the consequential penalty, depended on the outcome of the remission request, so no final determination could be made until that application was disposed of. The matter was therefore remanded to the lower adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after deciding the remission application, with directions for expeditious disposal of both stages. en-us Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214151 Duty demand linked to destruction of goods by fire was treated as premature where the remission application remained undecided. The tribunal noted that the liability to demand duty, and the consequential penalty, depended on the outcome of the remission request, so no final determination could be made until that application was disposed of. The matter was therefore remanded to the lower adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after deciding the remission application, with directions for expeditious disposal of both stages. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214151