<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 461 - CESTAT, New DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214149</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT in New Delhi ruled in favor of the applicant with multiple manufacturing units. The Tribunal found no dispute on the duty paid character of inputs and their proper utilization. It held that providing the corporate office address in the invoice does not justify denying credit to the assessee. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 461 - CESTAT, New DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214149</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT in New Delhi ruled in favor of the applicant with multiple manufacturing units. The Tribunal found no dispute on the duty paid character of inputs and their proper utilization. It held that providing the corporate office address in the invoice does not justify denying credit to the assessee. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>