<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deduction of Rs. 20,36,000 for bad debts to be allowed. The Tribunal found that the amount claimed was part of a provision made in a prior year and denying the deduction would result in double taxation. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and accounting entries, ensuring that the assessee was not seeking a double deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deduction of Rs. 20,36,000 for bad debts to be allowed. The Tribunal found that the amount claimed was part of a provision made in a prior year and denying the deduction would result in double taxation. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and accounting entries, ensuring that the assessee was not seeking a double deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>