<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 432 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer and exporter of IC Diesel Engines, in a drawback dispute. The Tribunal held that even though the appellant initially applied for drawback under Rule 6, they should be considered eligible for drawback under Rule 7 due to meeting the criteria. The Tribunal found no intentional mis-declaration by the appellant and directed the adjudicating authority to reassess the claim under Rule 7, emphasizing that claims should not be rejected solely for being filed under the wrong rule. The case was remanded for fresh consideration under Rule 7, granting the appellant an opportunity to substantiate their claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 432 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer and exporter of IC Diesel Engines, in a drawback dispute. The Tribunal held that even though the appellant initially applied for drawback under Rule 6, they should be considered eligible for drawback under Rule 7 due to meeting the criteria. The Tribunal found no intentional mis-declaration by the appellant and directed the adjudicating authority to reassess the claim under Rule 7, emphasizing that claims should not be rejected solely for being filed under the wrong rule. The case was remanded for fresh consideration under Rule 7, granting the appellant an opportunity to substantiate their claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>