<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 430 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214115</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to include advocates in the list of professionals for issuing certificates in e-Forms under the Companies Act, 1956 and Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008. The court emphasized compliance with existing provisions requiring declarations by specific professionals for registration and incorporation processes. It held that no direction could be given to the Legislature for changes sought by the petitioner. The judgment underscores adherence to statutory requirements in electronic filing, resulting in the denial of relief and dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 430 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214115</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to include advocates in the list of professionals for issuing certificates in e-Forms under the Companies Act, 1956 and Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008. The court emphasized compliance with existing provisions requiring declarations by specific professionals for registration and incorporation processes. It held that no direction could be given to the Legislature for changes sought by the petitioner. The judgment underscores adherence to statutory requirements in electronic filing, resulting in the denial of relief and dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>