<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 403 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214088</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing the reassessment, holding that s.153C applied and superseded ss.147/148. Documents seized in a s.132 search were transmitted to the AO, but the AO proceeded under s.148/147 without following the mandatory s.153C procedure; thus the s.148 notice and subsequent reassessment were illegal and void ab initio. The CIT(A) was justified in invalidating the assessment. Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed and grounds 1-4 were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 403 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214088</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing the reassessment, holding that s.153C applied and superseded ss.147/148. Documents seized in a s.132 search were transmitted to the AO, but the AO proceeded under s.148/147 without following the mandatory s.153C procedure; thus the s.148 notice and subsequent reassessment were illegal and void ab initio. The CIT(A) was justified in invalidating the assessment. Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed and grounds 1-4 were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>