<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 400 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214080</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the winding-up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the inability to deeply examine the dispute regarding the holding company&#039;s liability. The judgment highlighted the doctrine of single economic entity but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue recovery proceedings separately. It emphasized the necessity of impartial civil court proceedings to resolve the dispute effectively, emphasizing that future proceedings should not be influenced by the current case&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 400 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214080</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the winding-up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the inability to deeply examine the dispute regarding the holding company&#039;s liability. The judgment highlighted the doctrine of single economic entity but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue recovery proceedings separately. It emphasized the necessity of impartial civil court proceedings to resolve the dispute effectively, emphasizing that future proceedings should not be influenced by the current case&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>