<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 399 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214079</link>
    <description>The court in this case ruled that the sale deed executed after the appointment of the Provisional Liquidator was void. The claimant was not entitled to the plot but was awarded a refund with interest. The application was dismissed, and the claimant was restrained from dealing with the plot based on the invalid sale deed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 399 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214079</link>
      <description>The court in this case ruled that the sale deed executed after the appointment of the Provisional Liquidator was void. The claimant was not entitled to the plot but was awarded a refund with interest. The application was dismissed, and the claimant was restrained from dealing with the plot based on the invalid sale deed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>