<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 391 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214071</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could be used to pay service tax on GTA services for the period before the relevant amendment, because no legal bar existed to such utilisation and Rule 3(4)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permitted credit for payment of service tax on output services. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s payment through Cenvat credit was treated as valid, and refund relief followed as consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 391 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214071</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could be used to pay service tax on GTA services for the period before the relevant amendment, because no legal bar existed to such utilisation and Rule 3(4)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permitted credit for payment of service tax on output services. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s payment through Cenvat credit was treated as valid, and refund relief followed as consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>