<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214066</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed appeals for deductions under Section 80-IB(10) for various housing projects, except for the Shanti Niketan Project, which was withdrawn. The decisions were based on interpreting the law applicable at the time of project approvals and the principle of liberal interpretation of tax incentives to promote economic growth. The ITAT referenced precedents like Brahma Associates to support its conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214066</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed appeals for deductions under Section 80-IB(10) for various housing projects, except for the Shanti Niketan Project, which was withdrawn. The decisions were based on interpreting the law applicable at the time of project approvals and the principle of liberal interpretation of tax incentives to promote economic growth. The ITAT referenced precedents like Brahma Associates to support its conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>