<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided partial relief to both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on legal and professional expenses, classification of rental income, and the addition under Section 41(1). However, issues regarding disallowance under Section 14A, interest disallowance, and computation of book profit under Section 115JB were remanded for further examination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided partial relief to both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on legal and professional expenses, classification of rental income, and the addition under Section 41(1). However, issues regarding disallowance under Section 14A, interest disallowance, and computation of book profit under Section 115JB were remanded for further examination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>