<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 374 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214054</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling against the Revenue in a case concerning rectification under section 154 and the carry forward of losses and allowances for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93. The Court cited precedent that rectification under section 154 is not permissible on debatable issues, emphasizing that such issues cannot be considered apparent mistakes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and denying costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 374 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214054</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling against the Revenue in a case concerning rectification under section 154 and the carry forward of losses and allowances for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93. The Court cited precedent that rectification under section 154 is not permissible on debatable issues, emphasizing that such issues cannot be considered apparent mistakes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and denying costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>