<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 373 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214053</link>
    <description>The case involved M/s. ILPEA Paramount Ltd. challenging an order for a refund under the Customs Act, which was upheld by the impugned order. The petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the duty drawback claim was condoned due to unavoidable circumstances. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and directed the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedure under Rule 7A for condonation of delay, leaving the final decision to the Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 373 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214053</link>
      <description>The case involved M/s. ILPEA Paramount Ltd. challenging an order for a refund under the Customs Act, which was upheld by the impugned order. The petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the duty drawback claim was condoned due to unavoidable circumstances. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and directed the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedure under Rule 7A for condonation of delay, leaving the final decision to the Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>