<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the CENVAT Credit on ceramic mugs as input credit for the appellant, a manufacturer of insulated wares, despite the Department&#039;s contention that these items did not qualify as inputs. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the ceramic mugs were essential for the manufacturing process, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the CENVAT Credit on ceramic mugs as input credit for the appellant, a manufacturer of insulated wares, despite the Department&#039;s contention that these items did not qualify as inputs. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the ceramic mugs were essential for the manufacturing process, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>