<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 366 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214046</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s excess availment of Cenvat credit from a 100% EOU was due to a bonafide mistake rather than intentional evasion. The appellant promptly rectified the error and cooperated with the department. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was deemed unnecessary and set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 366 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214046</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s excess availment of Cenvat credit from a 100% EOU was due to a bonafide mistake rather than intentional evasion. The appellant promptly rectified the error and cooperated with the department. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was deemed unnecessary and set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>