<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214036</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 14A, emphasizing the direct connection between the loan received and the capital contribution to the partnership firm. The ITAT agreed that the partnership deed did not require capital contribution for profit sharing, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214036</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 14A, emphasizing the direct connection between the loan received and the capital contribution to the partnership firm. The ITAT agreed that the partnership deed did not require capital contribution for profit sharing, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>