<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected all four appeals, upholding the duty demand but waiving the penalties. The decision highlights the balance between protecting government revenue and the rights of bona fide purchasers of DEPB scrips. Recent judicial precedents played a crucial role in determining the applicability of extended periods for duty recovery, emphasizing the evolving legal landscape in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected all four appeals, upholding the duty demand but waiving the penalties. The decision highlights the balance between protecting government revenue and the rights of bona fide purchasers of DEPB scrips. Recent judicial precedents played a crucial role in determining the applicability of extended periods for duty recovery, emphasizing the evolving legal landscape in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>