<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 320 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded all issues to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing compliance with Rule 46A and providing the AO an opportunity to examine and rebut additional evidence. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes due to procedural lapses in admitting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 320 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded all issues to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing compliance with Rule 46A and providing the AO an opportunity to examine and rebut additional evidence. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes due to procedural lapses in admitting evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>