<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 316 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, after considering arguments from both parties and referencing a Bombay High Court judgment, concluded that a contractor-cum-developer was eligible for deductions under section 80-IA(4) of the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the need for a harmonious interpretation of the conditions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing all four appeals and highlighting the importance of fairness and practical application in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 316 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, after considering arguments from both parties and referencing a Bombay High Court judgment, concluded that a contractor-cum-developer was eligible for deductions under section 80-IA(4) of the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the need for a harmonious interpretation of the conditions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing all four appeals and highlighting the importance of fairness and practical application in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>