<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 315 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04, as the initiation of reassessment was deemed bad in law due to the invalid notice issued under section 148. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions/disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 315 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04, as the initiation of reassessment was deemed bad in law due to the invalid notice issued under section 148. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions/disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>