<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 286 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213966</link>
    <description>Section 35DDA was treated as a self-contained deduction provision, so Rule 2BA conditions were not read into it; VRS expenditure was allowed, while related closure and restructuring costs were treated as capital but permitted in instalments. Printers, UPS and switches qualified for the higher computer depreciation rate, but depreciation on assets of the closed Dharuhera unit was denied because ownership and business use after transfer were not established. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses were held to be revenue in nature and fully deductible. Sales tax paid under protest remained deductible under section 43B because payment was made within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 286 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213966</link>
      <description>Section 35DDA was treated as a self-contained deduction provision, so Rule 2BA conditions were not read into it; VRS expenditure was allowed, while related closure and restructuring costs were treated as capital but permitted in instalments. Printers, UPS and switches qualified for the higher computer depreciation rate, but depreciation on assets of the closed Dharuhera unit was denied because ownership and business use after transfer were not established. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses were held to be revenue in nature and fully deductible. Sales tax paid under protest remained deductible under section 43B because payment was made within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>