https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213958 The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 50,000. The Chief Commissioner rejected the compounding application due to contradictions in the appellant's submissions. The Tribunal confirmed its jurisdiction to hear appeals against orders by the Chief Commissioner. Despite alleged contradictions and omissions in the appellant's submissions, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Chief Commissioner for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity for the appellant. en-us Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213958 The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 50,000. The Chief Commissioner rejected the compounding application due to contradictions in the appellant's submissions. The Tribunal confirmed its jurisdiction to hear appeals against orders by the Chief Commissioner. Despite alleged contradictions and omissions in the appellant's submissions, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Chief Commissioner for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213958