<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 256 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure on neon signs and glow signs should be treated as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the commercial nature of the expenditure, consistency in treatment in previous years, and the primary purpose of the expenditure in business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 256 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure on neon signs and glow signs should be treated as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the commercial nature of the expenditure, consistency in treatment in previous years, and the primary purpose of the expenditure in business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>