https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213929 A communication issued by a Deputy Commissioner with the Commissioner's approval was treated as appealable to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal used its procedural power to avoid a fresh appeal and delay. The refusal to approve bulk CT-1 certificates was based on missing particulars such as quantity, description, and value of goods; because the applicant was willing to supply those details, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on a new application. Where a request is rejected for want of necessary particulars and the applicant can furnish them, remand for reconsideration is appropriate in the interest of justice. en-us Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213929 A communication issued by a Deputy Commissioner with the Commissioner's approval was treated as appealable to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal used its procedural power to avoid a fresh appeal and delay. The refusal to approve bulk CT-1 certificates was based on missing particulars such as quantity, description, and value of goods; because the applicant was willing to supply those details, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on a new application. Where a request is rejected for want of necessary particulars and the applicant can furnish them, remand for reconsideration is appropriate in the interest of justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213929