https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213927 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order canceling the appellant's Central Excise registration, emphasizing that registration is not an asset subject to succession disputes. As the appellant fulfilled manufacturing obligations and paid excise duty, the Tribunal found no grounds for cancellation, stating ownership disputes should be resolved in civil court. The judgment underscores the Tribunal's limited jurisdiction in ownership matters, allowing the appellant to continue manufacturing activities under the existing registration. en-us Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2013 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213927 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order canceling the appellant's Central Excise registration, emphasizing that registration is not an asset subject to succession disputes. As the appellant fulfilled manufacturing obligations and paid excise duty, the Tribunal found no grounds for cancellation, stating ownership disputes should be resolved in civil court. The judgment underscores the Tribunal's limited jurisdiction in ownership matters, allowing the appellant to continue manufacturing activities under the existing registration. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213927