<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 245 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213925</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the refund claim for services related to export, such as C&amp;amp;F agent and transportation charges, based on documentation compliance. However, the refund claim for fumigation charges was rejected due to the absence of a written agreement, as required for specialized cleaning processes for export goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding fumigation charges was allowed, while the appeal for other services was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 245 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213925</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the refund claim for services related to export, such as C&amp;amp;F agent and transportation charges, based on documentation compliance. However, the refund claim for fumigation charges was rejected due to the absence of a written agreement, as required for specialized cleaning processes for export goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding fumigation charges was allowed, while the appeal for other services was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>