<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 237 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213917</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remanding various issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration or adjustments based on legal guidelines and precedents. The Tribunal provided detailed analysis and directions on transfer pricing adjustments, risk adjustments, deduction computation, and the application of a +/- 5% variation in the Arm&#039;s Length Price calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 237 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213917</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remanding various issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration or adjustments based on legal guidelines and precedents. The Tribunal provided detailed analysis and directions on transfer pricing adjustments, risk adjustments, deduction computation, and the application of a +/- 5% variation in the Arm&#039;s Length Price calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>