<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 235 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the loans received from its subsidiaries were not deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were considered unjustified as the primary issue was decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed a retired ITAT member to practice before it, following a stay granted by the Allahabad High Court, dismissing the stay petitions filed by the assessee as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 235 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the loans received from its subsidiaries were not deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were considered unjustified as the primary issue was decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed a retired ITAT member to practice before it, following a stay granted by the Allahabad High Court, dismissing the stay petitions filed by the assessee as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>