<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 229 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213909</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Revenue, directing the apportionment of the corporate membership fee of Rs.15 lakhs over ten years. The expenditure was deemed revenue and prepaid in nature, requiring proportional write-off over the membership period. The decision was based on the analysis that the membership provided enduring benefits over multiple years, falling under the category of prepaid expenditure rather than capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 229 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213909</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Revenue, directing the apportionment of the corporate membership fee of Rs.15 lakhs over ten years. The expenditure was deemed revenue and prepaid in nature, requiring proportional write-off over the membership period. The decision was based on the analysis that the membership provided enduring benefits over multiple years, falling under the category of prepaid expenditure rather than capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>