<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 220 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213900</link>
    <description>Dismissal of an excise appeal for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was set aside where no waiver application had been filed, but the appellant explained the omission as inadvertent and undertook to regularise it. The Tribunal directed the appellant to file the stay petition before the first appellate authority within four weeks, and required that authority to consider the petition and pass an order. The appeal was restored and remanded for consideration of the pre-deposit waiver request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 220 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213900</link>
      <description>Dismissal of an excise appeal for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was set aside where no waiver application had been filed, but the appellant explained the omission as inadvertent and undertook to regularise it. The Tribunal directed the appellant to file the stay petition before the first appellate authority within four weeks, and required that authority to consider the petition and pass an order. The appeal was restored and remanded for consideration of the pre-deposit waiver request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>