<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 216 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but waived the penalty imposed under Section 76, invoking its powers under Section 80. Despite confirming the service tax liability, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s financial situation and the specific circumstances of the case, deeming it appropriate to waive the penalty due to the small amount involved and the representations made by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 216 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but waived the penalty imposed under Section 76, invoking its powers under Section 80. Despite confirming the service tax liability, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s financial situation and the specific circumstances of the case, deeming it appropriate to waive the penalty due to the small amount involved and the representations made by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>