<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 215 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalties against the appellant. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, directing them to consider the audit report and provide specific reasons for the demand already discharged by the appellant. The appellant was granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 215 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalties against the appellant. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, directing them to consider the audit report and provide specific reasons for the demand already discharged by the appellant. The appellant was granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>