<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 199 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213879</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed as the petitioner&#039;s representative lacked the authority to initiate winding-up proceedings. The court did not delve into other issues like the bona fide dispute of debt, alternative remedies, and commercial insolvency due to this primary ground of dismissal. No costs order was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 199 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213879</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed as the petitioner&#039;s representative lacked the authority to initiate winding-up proceedings. The court did not delve into other issues like the bona fide dispute of debt, alternative remedies, and commercial insolvency due to this primary ground of dismissal. No costs order was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>