<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 198 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213878</link>
    <description>For SSI exemption computation, clearances already exempt or chargeable at nil duty, and brand-name clearances, were excluded from the preceding year turnover under the notification scheme, so the turnover had to be reworked before deciding eligibility for 1990-91. The Tribunal treated the earlier notification position as continuing until amendment and remanded the SSI claim for re-quantification of duty. On pat scrap arising during manufacture of aluminium circles, the record lacked a clear finding on excisability, so the issue was also remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the parties and recording a specific duty-liability finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 198 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213878</link>
      <description>For SSI exemption computation, clearances already exempt or chargeable at nil duty, and brand-name clearances, were excluded from the preceding year turnover under the notification scheme, so the turnover had to be reworked before deciding eligibility for 1990-91. The Tribunal treated the earlier notification position as continuing until amendment and remanded the SSI claim for re-quantification of duty. On pat scrap arising during manufacture of aluminium circles, the record lacked a clear finding on excisability, so the issue was also remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the parties and recording a specific duty-liability finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>