https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213877 The High Court quashed the Tribunal's order due to lack of reasoning and remanded the matter back for further consideration. The appellant's counsel argued against reliance on retracted statements and highlighted discrepancies in evidence. The Tribunal found flaws in the adjudicating authority's reasoning, particularly regarding the partner's retracted statement and discrepancies in quantity of cleared goods. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to remand the matter back for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed by remand, setting aside the previous order for a fresh review. en-us Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213877 The High Court quashed the Tribunal's order due to lack of reasoning and remanded the matter back for further consideration. The appellant's counsel argued against reliance on retracted statements and highlighted discrepancies in evidence. The Tribunal found flaws in the adjudicating authority's reasoning, particularly regarding the partner's retracted statement and discrepancies in quantity of cleared goods. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to remand the matter back for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed by remand, setting aside the previous order for a fresh review. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213877