<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 179 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213859</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision in a case concerning the valuation of closing stock, application of the FIFO method, and reducing additions. The court emphasized the importance of consistency in valuation methods and considering actual sales data to value different parts of the stock. It was concluded that the findings were based on the material on record and did not raise any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 179 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213859</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision in a case concerning the valuation of closing stock, application of the FIFO method, and reducing additions. The court emphasized the importance of consistency in valuation methods and considering actual sales data to value different parts of the stock. It was concluded that the findings were based on the material on record and did not raise any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>