https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213852 The application for condonation of delay in filing cross-objections was withdrawn during the proceedings, leading to its dismissal. The appeal against the original order proceeded without the cross-objections. Regarding the availment of cenvat credit on Rent-a-Cab service, the High Court's precedent established that such services qualify as input services eligible for credit. The appellate authority's decision was upheld based on this settled legal position. Consequently, the appeal was rejected in line with the High Court's ruling in a similar case, affirming the eligibility of cenvat credit for Rent-a-Cab services. en-us Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213852 The application for condonation of delay in filing cross-objections was withdrawn during the proceedings, leading to its dismissal. The appeal against the original order proceeded without the cross-objections. Regarding the availment of cenvat credit on Rent-a-Cab service, the High Court's precedent established that such services qualify as input services eligible for credit. The appellate authority's decision was upheld based on this settled legal position. Consequently, the appeal was rejected in line with the High Court's ruling in a similar case, affirming the eligibility of cenvat credit for Rent-a-Cab services. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213852