<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to a minor discrepancy in service tax payment attributed to clerical errors. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s prompt rectification and the insignificant nature of the short-payment compared to the overall tax paid. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief, and the stay petition and application for condonation of delay were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to a minor discrepancy in service tax payment attributed to clerical errors. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s prompt rectification and the insignificant nature of the short-payment compared to the overall tax paid. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief, and the stay petition and application for condonation of delay were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>