<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 158 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213838</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issue of disallowance under Section 14A was remanded for fresh adjudication to ascertain the utilization of borrowed funds. The deletion of addition due to disallowance of excess depreciation on computer peripherals was upheld based on the entitlement to higher depreciation for peripherals integral to the computer system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 158 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213838</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issue of disallowance under Section 14A was remanded for fresh adjudication to ascertain the utilization of borrowed funds. The deletion of addition due to disallowance of excess depreciation on computer peripherals was upheld based on the entitlement to higher depreciation for peripherals integral to the computer system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>