<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 154 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of Rs. 50,00,000 for unexplained share application money and Rs. 9,75,668 for interest earned on bank deposits. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to sufficiently prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, leading to the additions being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 154 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of Rs. 50,00,000 for unexplained share application money and Rs. 9,75,668 for interest earned on bank deposits. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to sufficiently prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, leading to the additions being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>