https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213833 The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal concerning the disallowance of supervision charges. The Tribunal acknowledged the burden of proof not being met for a balance figure of Rs. 5,50,000 and decided to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 2,00,000 on an ad-hoc basis. This decision took into account the challenges faced by the assessee in producing evidence due to the business being discontinued five years ago. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 May 2012 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213833 The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal concerning the disallowance of supervision charges. The Tribunal acknowledged the burden of proof not being met for a balance figure of Rs. 5,50,000 and decided to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 2,00,000 on an ad-hoc basis. This decision took into account the challenges faced by the assessee in producing evidence due to the business being discontinued five years ago. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213833